Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin-developers=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <37BCFE9D.127F40A6@vinschen.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:07:09 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna AT vinschen DOT de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: de,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
CC: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: strftime and timezone patch patched
References: <199908190308 DOT XAA11621 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <37BC8D4A DOT 7D8C6F55 AT vinschen DOT de> <199908200236 DOT WAA08141 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> But I *don't* want cygwin_tzset to have a chance to define TZ.  I want
> the new code in tzsetwall() to do it.  If cygwin_tzset() needs to be
> called again *after* TZ is defined, fine, but the code in
> cygwin_tzset() that sets TZ from the NT information is woefully
> inadequate.  I added code from a different contributor that makes
> tzsetwall() do a more complete job of setting TZ from the NT
> information - that should be used instead, and thus cygwin_tzset needs
> to be called further down in the code (after the call to tzsetwall()
> at least).
> 
> >       * localtime.c: calls cygwin_tzset again.
> >
> > -#if 0 /* we set it more accurately in tzsetwall() */
> > +#if 1 /* we set it more accurately in tzsetwall() */

That's fine but what should I do now? I didn't know your intentions.
Is the aforementioned change to localtime.c applied to the latest
snapshot?

Regards,
Corinna