Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 21:49:33 -0400 From: Chris Faylor To: Corinna Vinschen Cc: cygdev Subject: Re: ntsec patch 10 Message-ID: <19990807214933.A5097@cygnus.com> References: <37AC2878 DOT F2D7458D AT vinschen DOT de> <37AC29BD DOT CBEB8F3 AT vinschen DOT de> <19990807123405 DOT F815 AT cygnus DOT com> <37ACA3F1 DOT BD44D13F AT vinschen DOT de> <19990807173112 DOT A4916 AT cygnus DOT com> <37ACA962 DOT C9D9DD3B AT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: <37ACA962.C9D9DD3B@vinschen.de>; from Corinna Vinschen on Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 11:47:14PM +0200 On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 11:47:14PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >Chris Faylor wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 11:24:01PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >The second strace is of `man man' in tcsh, CYGWIN="notty binmode ntea nontsec". >> >I got the following message: >> > >> > strace: couldn't get message length from subprocess 112<00000028>, >> > windows error 6 >> > >> >No other output from man is generated when it is straced. >> >> Are you sure that you're using the latest version of strace? It sounds like >> you're still running the old version. > >Yes, I have checked it, it _is_ the latest strace. Do I sth wrong? No. I did. If you compiled it yourself, try compiling it *without* -DDEBUGGING. I left in some code that shouldn't be there. cgf