From: cgf AT cygnus DOT com (Christopher Faylor) Subject: Re: Changes to winsup-980812 20 Aug 1998 06:59:26 -0700 Message-ID: <19980820093934.B23493.cygnus.cygwin32.developers@cygnus.com> References: <35D7692D DOT 55D70D8 AT cityweb DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Corinna Vinschen Cc: cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com On Thu, Aug 20, 1998 at 12:03:34PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >IMHO, the implementation of the function 'gethostname()' is worse than >nothing, because the name, returned by 'GetComputerName()' may not be >the same name as returned by the wsock-function 'gethostname()'. I >have patched it at home, but I havn't sent the patch, because I haven't >realized the 'deep sense' of the official version (W95?). Sergey >Okhapkin has written to me 'TCP/IP may be not installed'. Does anybody >need 'gethostname()' if he/she doesn't have installed TCP/IP???? That's an impossible question to answer. I certainly assume that it is possible. Maybe the "correct" way to do this is to use winsock gethostname and if that fails or returns an empty string, default to GetComputerName(). >Now the patch: Once we receive the assignment form, I'd appreciate it if you'd provide us with a full diff -cp again so that there is no confusion. Thanks, -chris