Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:05:41 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: uid > 64k Message-ID: <20030306200541.GB10932@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <3E675F8D DOT 414B9BBD AT ieee DOT org> <20030306164822 DOT GT1193 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3E6780A9 DOT F1F32899 AT ieee DOT org> <20030306171033 DOT GB7674 AT redhat DOT com> <3E678A49 DOT 707BF9D0 AT ieee DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E678A49.707BF9D0@ieee.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:50:01PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Couldn't you just keep track of the uids and ensure that you didn't >> duplicate any? > >Yes, absolutely. >However there is no guarantee that users won't call separately mkpasswd -l >and mkpasswd -d, or another mkpasswd -d other_domain, or mkpasswd -d -u >It would be desirable to return the same uid in all these cases. But why not just record whatever is already in /etc/passwd? Subsequent calls are just going to be appending to it, right? cgf