Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:58:38 -0500 (EST) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com To: "Pierre A. Humblet" cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mkpasswd and domain users. In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20030220203958.007b4330@mail.attbi.com> Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > The domain user who indirectly generated 7 mails to the list today > because he had forgotten to run mkgroup -d made me boil over. > > I would like to suggest a strong measure: include the current > (domain) user in the output of mkpasswd -l . Ditto for mkgroup. > > What do you think? Is there a down side? > > Pierre Will mk{passwd|group} -l attempt to contact the domain controller, then? If so, will there be a delay (if it's not available)? If not (i.e., similar to -c), will it print the correct information (especially group information)? Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Oh, boy, virtual memory! Now I'm gonna make myself a really *big* RAMdisk! -- /usr/games/fortune