Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:24:04 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: uh oh [Roland DOT Schwingel AT onevision DOT de: Re: bash broken with cygwin 1.3.20? - now working with 1.3.20] Message-ID: <20030214212404.GB9745@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030213144024 DOT GC27226 AT redhat DOT com> <3E4BB4EE DOT 6DF1C18B AT ieee DOT org> <20030214085422 DOT GB5822 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3E4D1046 DOT C2BEA2ED AT ieee DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E4D1046.C2BEA2ED@ieee.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:50:30AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > I am thinking of redoing acl_access by using the MS AccessCheck() function. > This will take care of the issue above, make the call completely independent of > the passwd and group files and better handle access_denied ACE's. > Any thought? Sounds interesting. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.