Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:04:44 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc static constructor multi-threading flaw
Message-ID: <20030214160444.GC18782@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3E4D06B8 DOT 5010306 AT hekimian DOT com> <20030214151314 DOT GA18458 AT redhat DOT com> <3E4D09CD DOT 1000709 AT hekimian DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E4D09CD.1000709@hekimian.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:22:53AM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>If this is a general gcc issue, then you should ping the gcc mailing list.
>
>I had the discussion on the gcc list some time ago.  E.g.:
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg00248.html
>
>Do you want me to ping them again?

Sure.  Pinging is the only way this kind of stuff gets done, unfortunately.

cgf