Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: So, *should* I go back to distributing the mingw/w32api sources in the cygwin source tarball?
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 14:59:28 -0600
Message-ID: <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKOEFKDMAA.g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
In-Reply-To: <20030208164444.GA8989@redhat.com>
Importance: Normal

[snip]

> I don't like the thought of duplication here but I guess I've finally
> grown weary of the bug reports from people who can't build from the
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> sources available via tarball.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Isn't this in violation of the GPL?  If so, isn't the answer "yes"?

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot.