Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:14:38 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: i386 and InterlockedIncrement inline asm
Message-ID: <20030124231438.GL8500@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030124214426 DOT 68083 DOT qmail AT web21414 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030124214426.68083.qmail@web21414.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:44:26AM +1100, Danny Smith wrote:
>Although I haven't find any bug reports about running cygwin exes on
>i386 (nor do I know of anyone with an i386 box to test), it could be a
>problem.  Has this potential problem been acknowledged anywhere?

Yes.  It's been brought up.  I've been waiting to see if there are any
complaints and so far I'm not aware of any.

cgf