Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:01:19 -0500
From: Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject: setregid() and setreuid() implementation proposal
To: Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Mail-followup-to: Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-id: <20030116190119.GD820@tishler.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

Is the following simplistic setregid() implementation acceptable?

    extern "C" int
    setregid (__gid16_t rgid, __gid16_t egid)
    {
      if (rgid != -1)
        {
          set_errno (EINVAL);
          return -1;
        }
      return setegid (egid);
    }

And, likewise for setreuid()?

If so, then I will submit the corresponding patch.

Thanks,
Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6