Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3DF9FA2C.F0885924@ieee.org> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:18:04 -0500 From: "Pierre A. Humblet" X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ntsec, inheritance and sec_acl References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20021205222631 DOT 007d3920 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com> <20021210112403 DOT B7796 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3DF614B3 DOT A127B1EA AT ieee DOT org> <20021213135702 DOT Q7796 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > It seem to require > a bunch of tricks inside of Cygwin for only having the advantage of > getting rid of the '+' in ls output... Right, that was the main purpose of that approach. So let's forget it. I will get going on putting the changes in alloc_sd to use the creator ACEs. We should still try to converge to a solution where chmod and chown follow the Sun acl conventions. Pierre