Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:56:27 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Time for 1.3.17 Message-ID: <20021127025627.GC831@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20021127021354 DOT GA12047 AT redhat DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20021126213545 DOT 0082fd10 AT h00207811519c DOT ne DOT client2 DOT attbi DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20021126213545.0082fd10@h00207811519c.ne.client2.attbi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:35:45PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >At 09:13 PM 11/26/2002 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Is ntsec in good shape right now? > >I think so. The two messages I just answered on the list appear >to be due to undesirable configurations. Crossing my fingers... Could you and/or Corinna provide a blurb for the release announcement in the standard format? The last time I said something about NT security I got a message from somebody in CERT asking if I could elaborate, so just don't call it that. :-) cgf