Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:27:44 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Want to release 1.3.16 Message-ID: <20021123062744.GA12764@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20021122233215 DOT A15763 AT fnord DOT io DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021122233215.A15763@fnord.io.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:32:15PM -0600, Steve O wrote: >On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> My "solution" to this problem was just to use large OS pipe buffers for ttys. >> That seems to "solve" the problem on NT4 and XP. I didn't try it on any >> Windows 9x variant, though. > >I'm not familiar with how Windows deals with it's buffers, but does >that mean that every tty allocates 64K of "kernel" memory? > >Also, here's a test to try before releasing: > >in an rxvt, or xterm: >cat /bin/cygwin1.dll > >This hangs for me with the CVS version as of 8pm 20021122 on XP. And it does what with cygwin 1.3.15? Don't hold us in suspense. cgf