Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:31:46 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Want to release 1.3.16
Message-ID: <20021115223146.GC28250@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <002201c28cf5$861c8f50$0201a8c0 AT sos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <002201c28cf5$861c8f50$0201a8c0@sos>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:22:43PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
>False alarm, more investigation required. On some systems the declaration is
>void pututline(...)
>but on another ones
>struct utmp *pututline(...)
>
>What is Unix 98 declaration?

Since there is no SUSv? version, the linux version rules.  That is:

       struct utmp *pututline(struct utmp *ut);

apparently.

Can we adhere to that?

cgf