Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3DD3E347.60703@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:54:15 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Fwd: Re: later w32api package required to build cygwin Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010005010906040101000601" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010005010906040101000601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Why isn't the cygwin build process using the winsup/w32api directory? --------------010005010906040101000601 Content-Type: text/plain; name="mailbox:///C|/Program Files/Netscape/Users/earnie_boyd/Mail5/Mail/pop.mail.yahoo.com/Inbox.sbd/Cygwin.sbd/CygwinUsers?number=4791043&part=1.29&type=message/rfc822&filename=cygwin.61485" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="mailbox:///C|/Program Files/Netscape/Users/earnie_boyd/Mail5/Mail/pop.mail.yahoo.com/Inbox.sbd/Cygwin.sbd/CygwinUsers?number=4791043&part=1.29&type=message/rfc822&filename=cygwin.61485" Message-ID: <005f01c28bf4$78c172a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: Subject: Re: later w32api package required to build cygwin Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:42:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit David Starks-Browning wrote: > I've been attempting to build cygwin1.dll from within Cygwin. > It fails because my installed /usr/include/w32api/winioctl.h (from the > w32api-2.0-1 package) is out of date compared to that in cvs > (winsup/w32api/include/winioctl.h). Bug report from me: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg01532.html I got no response. As I said in that message, I think it is a bug in gcc. Max. --------------010005010906040101000601--