Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:29:24 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: mingw-dvlpr AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Exception handling in gcc-3
Message-ID: <20021108162924.GB32143@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: mingw-dvlpr AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net,
	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT WNT DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0211081100010 DOT 308-400000 AT algeria DOT intern DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0211081100010.308-400000@algeria.intern.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:28:26AM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
>Hi Danny,
>
>i just had the time to look at the eh changes in gcc-3 for throwing
>exceptions across DLL/EXE boundaries.
>While the code works in 99% for cygwin and mingw it has one disadvantage
>for cygwin: The atom name is lost after a fork.

Why?

cgf