Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3DB5BC04.CD6587CB@ieee.org> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:58:44 -0400 From: "Pierre A. Humblet" X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Avoiding /etc/passwd and /etc/group scans References: <3DB416E7 DOT 99E22851 AT ieee DOT org> <20021021162246 DOT GC15828 AT redhat DOT com> <20021022162432 DOT GF514 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB58CBD DOT 87B2BDD8 AT ieee DOT org> <20021022181947 DOT GA4729 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB5A076 DOT ABAFF076 AT ieee DOT org> <20021022191217 DOT GD4828 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB5AB53 DOT B434ED90 AT ieee DOT org> <20021022202004 DOT GA6995 AT redhat DOT com> <20021022203300 DOT GC6429 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > Nope. I was wrong. If ntsec is active then it has complete control. > > I sort of like this since it is like linux but since setup.exe won't > properly extract files with the executable bit turned on, I guess I > have to override this. Crossing e-mails. > I guess I have to do the same thing for '#!' magic too, right? Ugh. > There goes a big ntsec advantage. Good point. Even when ntsec is on, cygwin will accept to execute shell scripts that do not have x. Pierre