Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] change to thread.cc -- need feedback
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20020930212217.GA4780@redhat.com>
References: <20020930151227 DOT GA10898 AT redhat DOT com>
	<1033420091 DOT 30057 DOT 213 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>  <20020930212217 DOT GA4780 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-nzdhZ0EpIn5wpe22MBtR"
Date: 01 Oct 2002 07:42:55 +1000
Message-Id: <1033422176.11273.219.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-nzdhZ0EpIn5wpe22MBtR
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 07:22, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Would it make sense to use a critical section here, then, instead?

It really doesn't matter. It's used once per pthread_mutex_init
call/PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER. So a mutex is fine.

Rob
--=20
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---

--=-nzdhZ0EpIn5wpe22MBtR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9mMVeI5+kQ8LJcoIRAskBAKDKdoGhRETgZWsZaZHcaiXUbjhFhACgjl53
ffRMJQ08psR6CWXpHSClV4Y=
=69ki
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-nzdhZ0EpIn5wpe22MBtR--