Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:15:51 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: cygserver usage questions
Message-ID: <20020930151551.GA11140@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

I notice that the code in cygserver creates some objects with
the default security rather than using something like &sec_none_nih.
Is that intentional?

I also didn't touch the many uses of \n terminated debug_printf's et al,
nor did I remove GetLastError from said calls, since I wasn't sure when
the code was supposed to run stand-alone.

If it makes sense, I would appreciate it if someone (Conrad?) could take
a sweep over the code, use correct attributes in object (event, mutex,
semaphore) creation, eliminate the \n from the printf output, and use %E
in place of GetLastError.

Thanks,
cgf