Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:24:50 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure
Message-ID: <20020930132450.GA12683@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1033265603 DOT 4374 DOT 95 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929022338 DOT GA12659 AT redhat DOT com> <1033267203 DOT 4374 DOT 100 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929024420 DOT GA13416 AT redhat DOT com> <1033271512 DOT 4372 DOT 102 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020929165333 DOT 0080fae0 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020929224948 DOT 00825140 AT h00207811519c DOT ne DOT client2 DOT attbi DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020929231122 DOT 0082b170 AT h00207811519c DOT ne DOT client2 DOT attbi DOT com> <20020930033001 DOT GC7906 AT redhat DOT com> <1033385337 DOT 30057 DOT 186 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1033385337.30057.186.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:28:56PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 13:30, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I'm seeing this now:
>> 
>> "Received a unexpected wait result on mutexInitializationLock -1"
>> 
>> sporadically during builds.
>
>What is the value of GetLastError(), and what was the handle value?

Unfortunately, I'm having unrelated problems building cygwin so I
can't say for sure.  As Pierre mentioned, someone changed the top-level
configury, making it impossible to build.

I also upgraded my version of gcc to the latest from the trunk last
night after the successful test suite run.  That was a mistake that
I am still recovering from.

So, the bottom line is that I am still scrambling to again produce a
version of the DLL that I trust.

cgf