Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:08:24 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure Message-ID: <20020930000824.GC27934@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020929020609 DOT GB11549 AT redhat DOT com> <1033265603 DOT 4374 DOT 95 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929022338 DOT GA12659 AT redhat DOT com> <1033267203 DOT 4374 DOT 100 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929024420 DOT GA13416 AT redhat DOT com> <1033271512 DOT 4372 DOT 102 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929141659 DOT GA23836 AT redhat DOT com> <1033309085 DOT 11273 DOT 69 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929185604 DOT GA25789 AT redhat DOT com> <1033343397 DOT 30057 DOT 167 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1033343397.30057.167.camel@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:49:56AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >I've implemented syncronisation around the pthread_mutex initialisation. >This will not impact performance except for *really badly* written >programs, as mutex creation is rare. > >I still can't reproduce the problem myself, but the changes just checked >in cause no regressions for the test suite here. > >Chris, does this help? Actually, it seems to have caused the problem to occur much more now. I'm rerunning the whole testsuite to see if there are regressions. cgf