Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:33:27 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure
Message-ID: <20020929233327.GB27934@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1033254454 DOT 4375 DOT 48 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929000215 DOT GB10872 AT redhat DOT com> <1033264646 DOT 4375 DOT 78 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929020609 DOT GB11549 AT redhat DOT com> <1033265603 DOT 4374 DOT 95 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929022338 DOT GA12659 AT redhat DOT com> <1033267203 DOT 4374 DOT 100 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929024420 DOT GA13416 AT redhat DOT com> <1033271512 DOT 4372 DOT 102 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020929165333 DOT 0080fae0 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20020929165333.0080fae0@mail.attbi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 04:53:33PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Sorry if this is known or irrelevant, but I just bumped into a 
>verifyable_object issue on WinME with a dll just built  
>with gcc 2.95 from fresh cvs.
>
>I also noticed that allow_ntsec == 1 on WinME,
>which at the very least causes useless calls. 

How did allow_ntsec become 1 on WinME?  That much at least should be
easy to debug.

Also, another question is:  Are you sure that you are using the latest
CVS sources?  This looks suspiciously like the problem which was just
fixed.

cgf

>Pierre
>
>> gdb -nw id
>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>0xbff6a767 in _system_dlls__ ()
>(gdb) where
>#0  0xbff6a767 in _system_dlls__ ()
>#1  0x00000220 in ?? ()
>#2  0xbff85def in _system_dlls__ ()
>#3  0x6107aba5 in verifyable_object_isvalid (objectptr=0x610b536c, 
>    magic=-552734650, static_ptr=0x0)
>    at ../../../../src/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc:1320