Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3D9717A9.4020703@netscape.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:09:29 -0400
From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT netscape DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 MultiZilla/v1.1.22
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure
References: <44642850720 DOT 20020928223759 AT logos-m DOT ru> <1033254454 DOT 4375 DOT 48 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929000215 DOT GB10872 AT redhat DOT com> <1033264646 DOT 4375 DOT 78 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929020609 DOT GB11549 AT redhat DOT com> <1033265603 DOT 4374 DOT 95 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929022338 DOT GA12659 AT redhat DOT com> <1033267203 DOT 4374 DOT 100 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929024420 DOT GA13416 AT redhat DOT com> <1033271512 DOT 4372 DOT 102 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929141659 DOT GA23836 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:51:52PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 12:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You sure you're actually using this DLL? 
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>
>>>As new-cygwin1.dll?  
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>
>>
>>>That's what
>>>the test suite code needs. 
>>>And, it needs to be in the winsup/cygwin directory.
>>
>>Yes.
> 
> 
> I've uploaded a pthread-condvar6.exe.bz2 to the same location.  I assume
> that this must have something to do with gcc 3.2, too, since it fails
> so consistently for me.

So then why don't you try compiling natively on your XP 
machine using CC="gcc-2" and CXX="g++-2"?  Seems it might 
eliminate another unknown if you can confirm Robert's findings.

Cheers,
Nicholas