Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <00e901c25fbe$3fe32170$6132bc3e@BABEL> From: "Conrad Scott" To: References: <00f001c25f4b$6a01bd40$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <1032384055 DOT 17676 DOT 254 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020918213840 DOT GE10913 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: cygserver merge Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:23:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 "Christopher Faylor" wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 07:20:54AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >I'm of the release-early-and-often camp. I vote to merge up. > > I agree. However, if you have made changes to other parts of cygwin > than the cygserver* files, you still need to get approval. The only changes outside of the cygserver-related files are in dcrt0.cc, fhandler_tty.cc, and tty.cc, where I've changed some of the cygserver code. I've not had to do such a merge before so how should I go from here? In particular, do I produce a single large patch that sweeps up all the changes pending on the branch? Or, do you want to see a separate patch for the non-cygserver files? Note that this can't quite be a simple merge since there are issues such as the include/sys files that are differently named on the mainline version; also the cygwin.din changes shouldn't be incorporated. Lastly, what sort of ChangeLog entry should I use? All the entries I've put into the branch ChangeLog or some summary or just "merge from branch"? > Also, please make sure that GNU coding standards are still being met. I'll check this through this evening: I think I've been conformant but I'll double check. > And, one thing that I usually do is sweep through the source files > eliminating excess white space, like space tab or space at the end of > lines. It would be nice if this was taken care of prior to the merge > rather than after. I frequently go through and check this too so it should all be clean: I'll run it through once more before submitting anything. Cheers, // Conrad