Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:38:40 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygserver merge
Message-ID: <20020918213840.GE10913@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <00f001c25f4b$6a01bd40$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <1032384055 DOT 17676 DOT 254 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1032384055.17676.254.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 07:20:54AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 05:41, Conrad Scott wrote:
>
>> Any votes either way?
>
>
>I'm of the release-early-and-often camp. I vote to merge up.

I agree.  However, if you have made changes to other parts of cygwin
than the cygserver* files, you still need to get approval.

Also, please make sure that GNU coding standards are still being met.
And, one thing that I usually do is sweep through the source files
eliminating excess white space, like space tab or space at the end of
lines.  It would be nice if this was taken care of prior to the merge
rather than after.

cgf