Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
X-WM-Posted-At: avacado.atomice.net; Fri, 6 Sep 02 20:03:59 +0100
From: "Chris January" <chris AT atomice DOT net>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 20:03:59 +0100
Message-ID: <LPEHIHGCJOAIPFLADJAHOEPMCLAA.chris@atomice.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3D78E7CA.3047CDAD@yahoo.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal

> > >> You know, I really could care less about this damn WINVER
> thing except
> > >> for the fact that I think that w32api developers are being
> inconsistent.
> > >
> > >I don't even care that much. What annoys me is the [temporary] breakage
> > >to cygwin - which is where the bug report was raised in the
> first place.
> > >
> > >JM2c.
> >
> > Good point.  Earnie, since you're a member of cygwin-developers, why did
> > you allow this to happen?
> >
>
> Christopher January was the person who made the original change.
>
> Christopher Faylor accepted that change.
>
> Someone reported a regression w.r.t. the change.
>
> I checked the MSDN and properly guarded the change as required.

Just to weigh in here, if you're going to go with Microsoft on the guard,
then I think it is only consistent to go with Microsoft on the value of
WINVER as well.

Chris