Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:52:50 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support
Message-ID: <20020906175250.GA24075@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020906150721 DOT GA22183 AT redhat DOT com> <1031329271 DOT 9096 DOT 49 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020906163701 DOT GL21699 AT redhat DOT com> <3D78E7CA DOT 3047CDAD AT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3D78E7CA.3047CDAD@yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:37:14PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Perhaps cgf needs to check the MSDN before making changes to the
>w32api.  Perhaps cgf needs a vacation.  Perhaps cgf needs to check his
>blood pressure.  ...

Ah! The old "cgf needs a vacation" ploy.  It's been a while.

Submitting a patch would have been trivial.  Instead you chose to deal
with this as if the cygwin code was something that other people were
responsible for.  That may be appropriate for cygwin at cygwin but
it really isn't kosher here.

cgf