Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3D78E7CA.3047CDAD@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:37:14 -0400 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support References: <20020906150721 DOT GA22183 AT redhat DOT com> <1031329271 DOT 9096 DOT 49 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020906163701 DOT GL21699 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:21:11AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 01:07, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> You know, I really could care less about this damn WINVER thing except > >> for the fact that I think that w32api developers are being inconsistent. > > > >I don't even care that much. What annoys me is the [temporary] breakage > >to cygwin - which is where the bug report was raised in the first place. > > > >JM2c. > > Good point. Earnie, since you're a member of cygwin-developers, why did > you allow this to happen? > Christopher January was the person who made the original change. Christopher Faylor accepted that change. Someone reported a regression w.r.t. the change. I checked the MSDN and properly guarded the change as required. > If you are not able to build cygwin to test your changes then you probably > shouldn't be on this list. > Perhaps cgf needs to check the MSDN before making changes to the w32api. Perhaps cgf needs a vacation. Perhaps cgf needs to check his blood pressure. ... Earnie.