Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20020906150721.GA22183@redhat.com>
References: <20020906150721 DOT GA22183 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-lRJxO4HvtYXCIO0/7RoG"
Date: 07 Sep 2002 02:21:11 +1000
Message-Id: <1031329271.9096.49.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-lRJxO4HvtYXCIO0/7RoG
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 01:07, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> You know, I really could care less about this damn WINVER thing except
> for the fact that I think that w32api developers are being inconsistent.

I don't even care that much. What annoys me is the [temporary] breakage
to cygwin - which is where the bug report was raised in the first place.

JM2c.

Rob

--=-lRJxO4HvtYXCIO0/7RoG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9eNX2I5+kQ8LJcoIRAg1hAKDDfvs+TE0PWxgATMGQtRId14lxCQCfexiU
7PzBPgzm/Z3oSQNlXI2ZEmg=
=OS+2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-lRJxO4HvtYXCIO0/7RoG--