Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:07:21 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Gee, everyone, thanks for the support
Message-ID: <20020906150721.GA22183@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

You know, I really could care less about this damn WINVER thing except
for the fact that I think that w32api developers are being inconsistent.

I also suspect that if there wasn't a hint of "cygwin" in the original
message, more people would have said "well, maybe we should change".

However, I don't care enough to fight this one.

I've already patched cygwin so this is a non-issue as far as I am
concerned.

If this is a big issue for anyone else then they should (and should have
been) arguing along with me.  Apparently, the way to do that is to say
"I agree with your position" multiple times, like Earnie seemed to do
with every message.

cgf