Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: vfork / setsid interaction
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: joseph DOT buehler AT spirentcom DOT com
Cc: Cygwin Developers <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <3D59147D.3080605@hekimian.com>
References: <3D59147D DOT 3080605 AT hekimian DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-MfGzDqe6sEXA32XwY6kS"
Date: 14 Aug 2002 00:18:11 +1000
Message-Id: <1029248291.12157.96.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-MfGzDqe6sEXA32XwY6kS
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:15, Joe Buehler wrote:
> I assume this is not "correct" behavior because this is the standard way
> that emacs does things on other platforms.

IIRC According to SUSv2, calling *anything* after [v]fork() other than
exec() may lead to unexpected behaviour.=20

You might like to reference the SUSv2 and see what the expected
behaviour is.

Rob


--=-MfGzDqe6sEXA32XwY6kS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9WRUiI5+kQ8LJcoIRAiRiAJ48OapYSyL5J8QeAGRfVhNrf20BPQCgjhFD
QXP4t0qX7lk7FOR9NqYBZjs=
=Ikcw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-MfGzDqe6sEXA32XwY6kS--