Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020729203620.0081c100@mail.attbi.com> X-Sender: phumblet AT mail DOT attbi DOT com Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:36:20 -0400 To: "Conrad Scott" From: "Pierre A. Humblet" Subject: Re: TCP problems Cc: In-Reply-To: <017001c23751$e0459390$6132bc3e@BABEL> References: <010901c23724$96e5d430$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <3D4581E4 DOT BB580995 AT ieee DOT org> <005801c23730$02304170$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <3D459257 DOT 240C79DC AT ieee DOT org> <009c01c23736$4a61a4b0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <3D459CEC DOT 35B29D99 AT ieee DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 11:47 PM 7/29/2002 +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: >If that is the problem raised and solved in the thread that starts >at http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2001-q4/msg00523.html, it >sounds a lot like the problem discussed in "BUG: Send() Fails with >Error WSAENOBUFS Over Blocking Socket", Nope, the one I was talking about was about Sat Apr 14 18:01:43 2001 Pierre A. Humblet * select.cc (socket_cleanup): Set SO_LINGER to small value so closed dummy sockets do not stay around. Use correct value for second argument to shutdown. Not sure why I ever wrote "small value" instead of 0. There should be a thread in the cygwin list. Pierre