Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:17:36 -0400 From: Jason Tishler Subject: Re: Corinna or Pierre please comment? [jason AT tishler DOT net: Re: setuid() problem when disconnected from PDC under 1.3.12-2] In-reply-to: <3.0.5.32.20020715162535.0080c900@mail.attbi.com> To: "Pierre A. Humblet" Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-followup-to: "Pierre A. Humblet" , cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <20020716191735.GB1692@tishler.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i References: <20020715155951 DOT GG2372 AT tishler DOT net> <20020713165415 DOT GB30143 AT redhat DOT com> <20020715110733 DOT B6932 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020715125051 DOT GC2372 AT tishler DOT net> <20020715145826 DOT H6932 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020715155951 DOT GG2372 AT tishler DOT net> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020715162535 DOT 0080c900 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com> Pierre, On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:25:35PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > At 07:24 PM 7/15/2002 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 11:59:51AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > > I agree with everything Corinna wrote (just back from a long trip). > The drawback of implementing a "lenient" version is that, without > special edits of /etc/group, some site-dependent "mysterious" failures > might happen when disconnected. Understood, but sshd and cron failing when disconnected is not good either. > Why not use a local account for sshd and cron? The above will be essentially unusable or at least extremely inconvenient. Repeatedly switching between PALO-ALTO\jatis (i.e., a domain user) and TISHLERJASON\jt (i.e., a local user) would not be fun. > Jason, can you telnet into the machine as a domain user when > disconnected from the PDC for a long time? If so are the groups (from > id) the same as when you are connected (working with an /etc/group > that includes the domain groups)? (just curious). I was thinking of trying the above experiment myself. I will disconnect before I leave work today and try first thing tomorrow. I will report back then. Thanks, Jason