Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 14:00:29 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Should sys/types.h include sys/sysmacros.h?
Message-ID: <20020501180029.GE18459@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020501125600 DOT GE3160 AT tishler DOT net> <20020501145706 DOT GF6736 AT redhat DOT com> <20020501171218 DOT GH3160 AT tishler DOT net> <20020501180344 DOT GI3160 AT tishler DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020501180344.GI3160@tishler.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:03:44PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Chris,
>
>On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:12:18PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:57:06AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:56:00AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>> > >Should newlib's sys/types.h include sys/sysmacros.h (possibly only for
>> > >Cygwin)?
>> 
>> > Could you send a patch to the newlib mailing list?
>> 
>> Yes, that was my plan.
>
>Actually, I just determined that sys/types.h includes cygwin/types.h.
>So, should I include sys/sysmacros.h in cygwin/types.h instead?

Yes.  Good plan.

cgf