Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CC7264F.7090800@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:40:31 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Global write privs for Robert Collins References: <20020424210243 DOT GA30767 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Uh oh....sensing a little friction in cygwin-developers.... Chris, is this a sarcastic reference to the thread(s) Apr 19,20 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q2/msg00070.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2002-04/msg00022.html about this patch (and reversal): http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2002-q2/msg00028.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2002-q2/msg00029.html I've checked cygwin-cvs mailing list, but I didn't see another instance of a checkin by Robert outside of cinstall/. You see, that was my first thought when I read your email -- "Oh crap, Robert went and (accidentally?) checked something in outside of cinstall again" or maybe even "Oh crap, cgf's got his knickers in a twist over Robert's instructions to me to 'check this in' ": http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-04/msg00400.html even though I did NOT do so, and instead waited the requisite day, and reposted on cygwin-patches...still looking for "official" permission to do so. Or am I just being WAY oversensitive, and this truly is a bonafide "promotion".... --Chuck Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that, after consultation with Corinna, we've > decided to extend the offer of global write privileges in the cygwin > tree to Robert Collins. > > What does this mean? Well, it's an amazingly exciting promotion. > Basically it means that he doesn't have to ask for permission to check > things in. > > However, it also means that Robert will probably often receive "Are you > sure?" email from Corinna or (most likely) me when things are checked > in. So, basically the potential for discussion is at the back end rather > than the front end. > > This comes at a good time since my available time for working in cygwin > is continually diminishing as my job responsibilities increase.