Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 19:13:00 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygdev Subject: Re: Interesting pipe feature. Message-ID: <20020402191300.A24025@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygdev References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020402111635 DOT 02674130 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020402114010 DOT 024c9c90 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3CA9E355 DOT D5691839 AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CA9E355.D5691839@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 11:59:01AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: > "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote: > > > > OK, sorry. You're right. Interestingly enough, I don't have trouble > > running `echo $COMSPEC` directly on W2K, although your command sequence > > above also works. Do you have the same problem with `echo $COMSPEC` on > > XP? > > > > Yes, that's what I said. Hmm... Nothing like consistancy. `echo $COMSPEC | sed -e 's#\\\\#/#g#'` ^^^^ works great on XPprof Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.