Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CA9AEDA.B7CC5F23@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 08:15:06 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Earnie Boyd X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Earnie Boyd CC: Robert Collins , Earnie Boyd Subject: Re: newlib/libc/stdlib/mallocr.c References: <3CA9ADBC DOT B86E80B0 AT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Earnie Boyd wrote: > > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:57 PM > > > To: Robert Collins > > > Cc: Earnie Boyd > > > Subject: Re: newlib/libc/stdlib/mallocr.c > > > > > > > > > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > > > > > FWIW, I've had trouble with HAVE_MMAP on in dlmalloc :[. > > > Some systems > > > > seem to allocate memory differently than the HAVE_MMAP code > > > on win32 > > > > expected. > > > > > > > > > > "Some systems"! What do you mean? > > > > Well my XP Professional machine anyway. When I was tracking down the > > setup memory problem, I build a custom malloc - using the latest > > dlmalloc.c and encountered this. > > > > Does the "latest dlmalloc.c" == "newlib/libc/stdlib/mallocr.c"? Could > your problems be solely related to "latest dlmalloc.c"? Could your > problems also result from other defaults that > "newlib/libc/stdlib/mallocr.c" overrides? > Oh, and _WIN32 would #define HAVE_MMAP 0 anyway. I just realized you were discussing a non-cygwin program. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com