Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:45:43 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Release 1.3.10 and then merge daemon code
Message-ID: <20020213014543.GH28002@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020212192227 DOT GA27947 AT redhat DOT com> <074801c1b403$aa422e10$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <074801c1b403$aa422e10$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 07:27:16AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>
>
>> After that, unless there are objections, I'd like to merge the daemon
>> code.  I haven't seen any significant complaints so it sounds like
>this
>> is a safe thing to do.
>
>I'll prepare an IPC free patch this weekend, time permitting (after
>setup, before libxml+libxslt).

Why IPC free?

I wouldn't bother with the patch.  Could you just tag and merge instead?
We can fix up any collateral damage afterwards.

cgf