Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: setup.exe command line options
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:52:52 +1100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
Message-ID: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F24B@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: setup.exe command line options
Thread-Index: AcFidYJxXcOFa+hfTl68Eh8BmrapYAAAPiCwAABY/iA=
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
   <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id fA11j8A12637

Got it working, not sure what was wrong. *shrug*.

Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins 
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:45 PM
> To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: RE: setup.exe command line options
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
> > >
> > >Have you tested this? AFAICT the __argv is for -mconsole 
> > programs only,
> > >with the main prolog initialising them in the msvcrt dll 
> > init... which
> > >in setup is not happening. 
> > >
> > >Or, IOW, __argc and __argv have been meaningless on every test I've
> > >done.
> > 
> > Yes.  I tested it with -mwindows -mno-cygwin.  I couldn't 
> print to the
> > console in that case so I ran it under the debugger.
> 
> I'm only ever getting the program path, not the additional 
> arguments...
> I assume I'm doing something wrong?!
> 
> FWIW, I'm building on win32.
> 
> Rob
>