Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3BDC8410.2010808@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 17:17:52 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: setup.exe stalled?
References: <20011024110825 DOT A17208 AT redhat DOT com> <3BD90938 DOT 5060205 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011027124314 DOT A12277 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 02:56:56AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> 
>>Okay, I noticed two weird things:
>>
>>1) somethings flaky with the parser.  libncurses5 (for instance) shows up 
>>in a category called "Base Libs" --- and does not show up in the "Base" or 
>>"Libs" category.
>>
> 
> This was a serious thinko on my part.  The setup.exe parser works as it should
> rather than the way I thought it did.
> 
> To indicate that a package belongs in two categories, you do this:
> 
> category: Foo Bar
> 
> not
> 
> category: "Foo Bar"
> 
> The latter results in a 'Foo Bar' category rather than two separate categories.
> I even got this wrong when I explained it to Gerrit Haase.
> 
> With luck, I've fixed both setup.ini and the 'upset' program which is used to
> generate the setup.ini.


I guess you probably ALSO should say:

requires: foo bar

and not

requires: "foo bar"

right?

--Chuck