Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:08:25 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: setup.exe stalled?
Message-ID: <20011024110825.A17208@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

I think that I have a functional version of setup.ini on
sources.redhat.com.  The next step is for people to do verification on
setup.exe to see that it works as expected.

Is anyone interested in doing this?  As I mentioned previously, I know of
one problem with setup.exe that is my problem but it is also in the branch
version so I don't think it is a big deal.  It should not impact any
testing.

I'd like to eventually be in the position where we stop promising that this
version of setup will do great things and actually unleash it on the world.

Does anyone think that it is ready for that?

Should I just release it as is?  That would imply that someone is
willing to field all of the questions that will eventually pop up about
this new version.

cgf