Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 01:11:41 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.3.4 status?
Message-ID: <20011024011141.A14238@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20011023005236 DOT 7136 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022205828 DOT C18754 AT redhat DOT com> <02ea01c15b5f$7e673bc0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011022212759 DOT A19493 AT redhat DOT com> <035a01c15b6b$e7788c70$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <039401c15b74$3555bd70$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <03d201c15b83$0e480990$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <03d801c15b83$663928f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011023131115 DOT E18754 AT redhat DOT com> <02d801c15c35$c5822f70$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <02d801c15c35$c5822f70$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:44:14PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Some related links:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/1998-08/msg00773.html
>http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/NEWS.txt (search for
>regparm - gcc bug noted - "Another GCC bug: 'regparm' attribute doesn't
>work in conjunction with 'alloca'"
>
>And finally, here is a trivial testcase should anyone want to see if gcc
>3 has this fixed and/or take this to the gcc list and ask for a bug fix
>for 2.95.3.

Thanks for the test case!

I tried this on Linux with gcc 2.96 and it worked ok.  I tried it with a
cygwin cross compiler built from the gcc cvs trunk and it worked ok.  It
failed, as we know, with the cygwin release of gcc 2.95.3.

I wonder if there is a patch in the 2.95 tree that could be applied here.

cgf