Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:51:02 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.3.4 status?
Message-ID: <20011022215102.A20341@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20011022193036 DOT 3609 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022203136 DOT 5144 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022203747 DOT 5162 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <02a201c15b5b$7910a4d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011022204740 DOT B18754 AT redhat DOT com> <20011023005236 DOT 7136 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20011022205828 DOT C18754 AT redhat DOT com> <02ea01c15b5f$7e673bc0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011022212759 DOT A19493 AT redhat DOT com> <032701c15b64$ea5523b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <032701c15b64$ea5523b0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:49:11AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:27 AM
>Subject: Re: 1.3.4 status?
>
>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:10:23AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> >Can you mail me the disas for the fhandler_read (with the source line
>> >tags) ? I don't have time today to build a new dll, but I can have a
>> >quick squint...
>>
>> It's below.
>>
>
>Maybe, I'm blind, but I cannot see the alloca call you mentioned
>before..

"chkstk" == "alloca"

Sorry, I should have mentioned that.  I just figured this out last week.

It's possible that this is actually a stack boundary check, I guess.

cgf