Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon,  1 Oct 2001 12:35:37 +0100
Message-ID: <5502-Mon01Oct2001123537+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: emacs 20.7.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 6.92 under Emacs 20.7.1
From: David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Put that in your pipe and...
In-Reply-To: <574-Fri28Sep2001163256+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
References: <20010924192023 DOT A32669 AT redhat DOT com>
	<7404-Fri28Sep2001131747+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
	<574-Fri28Sep2001163256+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>

On Friday 28 Sep 01, David Starks-Browning writes:
> On Friday 28 Sep 01, David Starks-Browning writes:
> > ...
> > 
> > I tried 20010925 snapshot on Win98 and this indeed solves the "cvs+ssh
> > hang when finished" problem.  Brilliant, thanks!
> > 
> > However, I've tried 20010925 and 20010927 snapshots on NT4-sp5, and it
> > causes xemacs (self compiled) to ignore any input.
> 
> Whoa there!  I did a rather poor job with that report.  In fact, I've
> narrowed it down to two snapshots 6 days apart:
> 
> My cygwin-compiled xemacs works fine with the cygwin-1.3.3-2 release
> of the DLL, and with the 20010918 snapshot DLL.  But it's broken in a
> subsequent snapshot DLL, 20010924.  (I can't tell you about the
> 20010922 snapshot DLL, because neither rxvt nor xemacs would run at
> all with that one...)

FYI, the 20011010 snapshot DLL does *not* exhibit these problems.
Well done Chris!  Thanks very much!

David