Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <0b3701c14432$40750930$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <20010922201928 DOT A21633 AT redhat DOT com> <08cd01c143f0$09b16fc0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010923091428 DOT C28032 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: New getopt.c has different behavior -- should it? Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:18:35 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2001 13:26:34.0543 (UTC) FILETIME=[5D7ABBF0:01C14433] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" > > > >This is one of the GNUism's that I'm very neutral on. As for the mailing > >list, I think we can count on one hand - in unary - the number of folk > >that aren't on the dev list, that run strace. So I don't think there > >will be much traffic :}. (That is, as long as we update the FAQ, the > >users guide and note in the release notes this change). > > I'm not worried about strace. I was just using that as an example. > Any application that uses getopt is potentially affected. Oh. Well unless you are planning on rolling it back if 1000's object, I suggest a quick poll of the userbase, or failing that (presumably due to time - I'm not able to volunteer the time neeeded to collate responses) just some clear doco. Rob