Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:26:09 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: AF_UNIX on win95?
Message-ID: <20010912132609.H1312@dothill.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1000310173.30375.137.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i

Rob,

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 01:56:12AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> FWIW waitforsingleobject in fhandler_scoket::check_peer_secret_event is
> returning 258.

The above implies that WaitForSingleObject() is returning WAIT_TIMEOUT.
FWIW, I recently fixed this (at least for NT/2000):

    http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2001-q3/msg00082.html

Like Egor, I don't know why its failing under 95.

HTH,
Jason