Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 21:54:03 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: winsup/mingw libstdc++.a]
Message-ID: <20010905215403.A15751@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT Cygwin DOT Com
References: <3B96ACB0 DOT CB3D2063 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010905194426 DOT A15906 AT redhat DOT com> <3B96BA01 DOT 945832A7 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010905195524 DOT A26502 AT redhat DOT com> <3B96C26B DOT A2919522 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010905212457 DOT A1866 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010905212457.A1866@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:24:57PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I guess my original reason for not just doing this was because I didn't
>want to step on anyone's toes and it seems like I must have done that
>here.

And, I meant to add that I apologize for doing that.  It was completely
unintentional.  Letting someone else handle the mingw release makes
perfect sense.  I should have done it back when Earnie and I first
discussed it.  I am not sure why I didn't.  I can't even claim tuit
problems in this case.  How much effort does it take to relinquish the
reins?

Let me know if you want my scripts for creating a release.  I have a version
checked in here:

cvs -d:ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel

I don't have the specific modules for cygwin/mingw/w32api checked in, though,
so I can send those or you can just roll your own.

cgf

>So, I'm relieved to pass this on to you.  I really do think that it is
>important that the -mno-cygwin/libstdc++ issue is resolved ASAP, though.