Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 22:44:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Charles Wilson Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.3.3 announcment -- extra words solicited Message-ID: <20010902224411.A21914@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: Charles Wilson , cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <999380998 DOT 30841 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B92D324 DOT 9030308 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B92EC8F DOT 3070605 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B92EC8F.3070605@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:35:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Charles Wilson wrote: >>got a signal 11 error when "Leaving directory > >cgf replied: >> ...and the signal 11 is coming from? > >Sorry for the delay -- I'm subscribed to the digest version so I had to >check replies via the archive. > >It's coming from make[4], I think (make, but which one of the spawned >subprocesses during this recursive build, I'm not sure.) > >I'll reproduce the error (although I'm now running 20010902...) and make >a more thorough report. But, I take your response to mean that you HAVE >successfully "bootstrap'ed" recent cygwin devel kernels (that is, built >a new kernel while running a devel kernel)? Yes, I've built a cygwin1.dll without error but I don't think I've bootstrapped it in the manner that you are describing. I rarely check out anything via 'cvs checkout'. I just use 'cvs update' to freshen my tree. I did a reconfigure and a 'make clean all' without error. cgf