Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:02:23 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: still can't duplicate rxvt problem
Message-ID: <20010829090223.A3834@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010829001235 DOT A2713 AT redhat DOT com> <20010829085932 DOT T808 AT dothill DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010829085932.T808@dothill.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:59:32AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Chris,
>
>On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:12:35AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I still can't duplicate the rxvt problem.
>
>Are you referring to the problem that I reported?  If so, would you be
>willing to try with my .bash_profile files if I post them?

I guess so.

>> Is anyone who can duplicate it willing to do the tedious "binary search
>> through cvs versions thing to see when it first occurred?
>
>I'm willing to try.  Unfortunately, this problem may have been lurking for
>a long time.  IIRC, I only started to notice this around the time that
>Cygwin bash 2.05 was released by Corrina (around 5/01) and I started
>to go (bash) command completion happy --  causing me to add two more
>command substitutions.

So, you're saying that this fails in 1.3.2, also?  I think that is
new information.

>I'm also willing to post (compressed) strace logs of a good and bad test
>run for perusal.  The compressed logs are about 128 KB each so I can put
>them on my web site for download if that is preferred.

The URL is preferable.

>Please let me know which way you want to proceed.

Well, if it is broken in 1.3.2, then I guess there is no need to do a
binary search.  I thought this was new behavior.

cgf