Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <008101c127d7$5c0073f0$0300a8c0@ufo>
From: "Trevor Forbes" <trevorforbes AT ozemail DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20010817205113 DOT D23849 AT redhat DOT com> <20010817224952 DOT B1208 AT dothill DOT com> <20010817231110 DOT A3188 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: libiberty fix
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 20:47:23 +0930
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700

Well, I tried the first "Chris" CVS fix and for me (which seems to be
opposite to everyone else), Cygwin built perfectly, unfortunately Insight
did not....

I tried Chris's last patch (configure.tar.bz2) and both Cygwin and Insight
built perfectly. I even rebuilt both again using the new cygwin1.dll with no
troubles.......  Also, all the Cygwin make check tests pass.....

# of expected passes           85
# of expected failures          17

For info, I build using Win2k.

I do not know why I am seeing differing results?

Trevor